Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
European Journal of Criminology
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Commitment to Crime

The Role of the Criminal Justice System

Marilyn Clark

University of Malta, Malta, marilyn.clark{at}um.edu.mt

Commitment is an important contingency in the criminal career and signifies a refutation by the offender of other possibilities of action. It is often facilitated by the perception on the part of the offender that little is to be gained by abandoning the criminal career. This perception is strengthened by a number of processes, including contact with the criminal justice system. This paper adopts a symbolic interactionist framework and explores how 41 incarcerated young offenders in Malta perceived their contact with the police, the courts and the prison as having influenced their involvement in crime. These young people were interviewed in depth, and their biographies were then used to develop grounded theory. The findings show how interventions by the criminal justice system were interpreted by young offenders as an intrusion that contributes to a reduction in their status. Offenders did not view themselves as locked into a deviant career; they regarded themselves as having chosen such a career after consideration of the costs and benefits. The paper concludes that commitment to criminality is not a passive process. Rather, commitment grows out of offenders’ interpretations of the contingencies encountered along the career path. Contacts with the police, the courts and the prison often solidify commitment because they are perceived as reducing the offender’s opportunities in the conventional world.

Key Words: Commitment • Criminal Career • Criminal Justice System • Malta

European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 3, No. 2, 201-220 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/1477370806061975


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?