This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Fishman, G. Articles by Turjeman, H. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Sentencing Outcomes in a Multinational Society

When Judges, Defendants and Victims Can Be either Arabs or Jews

Arye Rattner

Hagit Turjeman

University of Haifa, Israel

The focus of this paper is the effect of nationality on prison disposition in Israel. An interaction between the nationality of the judge, the perpetrator and the victim is examined. The data were collected in the northern district courts in Israel and consist of 1394 court records. The results show that being an Arab defendant is an inherent liability in the Israeli criminal justice system – they are more likely than Jews to receive prison sentences. Arab judges seem to be more punitive than their Jewish colleagues are. The nationality of the victim plays a significant role only in cases tried by Arab judges. In the case of an Arab judge and a Jewish victim the likelihood of an Arab defendant getting a prison sentence is higher than when the victim is an Arab. This leads to a consideration of the effect of stereotypes and the majority–minority and in–out group relations on the performance of the justice system.

Key Words: Sentencing Disparities • Stereotypes • Minority Group • In-Group • Justice System

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?