Group Processes & Intergroup Relations

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Young, H.
Right arrow Articles by Vries, N. d.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, Vol. 2, No. 3, 259-278 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/1368430299023004

The Asymmetrical Perception of Men and Women

Heather Young

TNO-Human Factors Research Institute and University of Nijmegen, young{at}tm.tno.nl

Ad van Knippenberg

University of Nijmegen

Naomi Ellemers

University of Leiden

Nanne de Vries

University of Amsterdam

This study examines the individuation versus categorization of men and women. Several researchers have argued for structural status differences between men and women - men occupy societal positions of high status, and women positions of low status. This line of research predicts that male participants will individuate other men, but categorize women. Conversely, female participants will individuate men as well as women. In the present study, male and female participants were presented with eight stimulus persons, four men and four women, each described by four attributes. In addition, stimulus-category fit was manipulated such that the attributes were either stereotypical of the gender group they described or gender neutral. Information clustering in free recall and name-matching were main dependent measures. The results support the hypotheses and are discussed in terms of status differentials and contemporary theories of person perception.

Key Words: categorization • gender perceptions • group status • information • clustering


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Group Processes Intergroup RelationsHome page
M. Hewstone, R. J. Crisp, A. Contarello, A. Voci, L. Conway, G. Marletta, and H. Willis
Tokens in the Tower: Perceptual Processes and Interaction Dynamics in Academic Settings with 'Skewed', 'Tilted' and 'Balanced' Sex Ratios
Group Processes Intergroup Relations, October 1, 2006; 9(4): 509 - 532.
[Abstract] [PDF]