This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by van Wilsem, J. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Criminal Victimization in Cross-National Perspective

An Analysis of Rates of Theft, Violence and Vandalism Across 27 Countries

Department of Criminology, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands, vanwilsem{at}frg.eur.nl

This research examines the effect of resource deprivation, criminal opportunities and social disorganization on national rates of homicide, non-lethal violence, theft and car vandalism. Previous cross-national research has concentrated on homicide variation, owing to the comparative problems associated with rates for other crimes. In the present article, International Crime Victims Survey (ICVS) data on various contact crimes, as well as homicide figures from the World Health Organization (WHO), are analysed across 27 East European and Western countries. First, a comparison of homicide levels with victimization rates for theft and non-lethal violence indicates considerable overlap, which suggests that countries with high levels of homicide tend to have high levels of other violence and theft too. Second, results from multivariate analyses indicate that income inequality is the most consistent structural correlate of victimization rates for homicide, theft, non-lethal violence and car damage across this selection of countries. Also, homicide and theft show negative relations with GDP per capita. This may indicate that societal development goes together with lower levels of exposure to likely homicide offenders (family, friends). However, the results provide no support for the crime-inducing impact of high target attractiveness, thereby challenging predictions derived from routine activity theory on theft.

Key Words: Cross-National Comparison • Crime Victimization • Violence • Theft • Vandalism

European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 1, No. 1, 89-109 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/1477370804038708


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Andresen Crime in Lithuania: The Impact of Accession to the European Union European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2009; 6(4): 337 - 360. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P.-O. H. Wikstrom and R. Svensson Why are English Youths More Violent Than Swedish Youths?: A Comparative Study of the Role of Crime Propensity, Lifestyles and Their Interactions in Two Cities European Journal of Criminology, July 1, 2008; 5(3): 309 - 330. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. T. Kaariainen Trust in the Police in 16 European Countries: A Multilevel Analysis European Journal of Criminology, October 1, 2007; 4(4): 409 - 435. [Abstract] [PDF]